Showing posts with label artist. Show all posts
Showing posts with label artist. Show all posts

1.11.2012

hefti.

exposed with moss spores. light in all the most interesting dark places.




images by Raphael Hefti.

3.10.2011

hobson.

thank you, Lydia, for showing me this wonderful work.


more Aaron Hobson found here.

casker.



photographs by Michael Casker found here.

8.30.2010

channeling chelsea perry.






i feel like i'm going to start playing around with the scanner. starting with personal effects. we'll see how this goes. Chelsea Perry can be found here.

p.s. miss you, chelsea.

8.25.2010

carey.












Ellen Carey to be found here.

20x24 self portrait polaroids that are crisp and pretty incredible to look at. she seems like she has a strong interest in the process with her extensive pulls and abstraction work, presenting us with the raw components of what the photograph is made of, something i touched on attempting to do with a constructed negative process. she is actually an alum of KCAI, i have no idea how i've never heard of her before today.

"These pictures physically are pure photography, like Talbot- light and process only in the late 20th century as opposed to the 19th. What they represent is a challenge to our previously prescribed historical and cultural expectation that a photograph will narrate, describe, and document."

8.21.2010

coyne.





Petah Coyne

6.12.2010

subterraneans.





this is something Alex Lovell-Smith, Dusty Colyer and I started to work on before Alex left to go back to New Zealand. bit of a rough edit, but still working them out with the cs5. repost in time.

6.11.2010

chiara.






John Chiara.

6.08.2010

silverman.






i've always wanted to do something like this. i guess she beat me to it.

Lynn Silverman found here.

4.21.2010

bridges.







Marilyn Bridges' website here.

4.18.2010

ganson.



"i do my best at finding ways to express ... with materials. and it always feels really crude, it's always a struggle. but somehow i manage to sort of get this thought out into an object. and then it's there, okay? it means nothing at all, the object itself just means nothing. once it's perceived and someone brings it into their own mind then there's a cycle that has been completed. and to me that's the most important thing, because ever since being a kid i wanted to communicate my passion and love and that means the complete cycle of coming from inside out to the physical to someomne perceiving it."

4.08.2010

guest.







Christopher Bucklow's website here.